Disentangling Important Factors in Service Quality: An Empirical Study in Vocational Higher Education at Bandung City

Authors

  • Pepi Zulvia Politeknik STIA LAN Bandung
  • Hendrikus Tri Wibawanto Gedeona Politeknik STIA LAN Bandung
  • Hafid Aditya Pradesa Politeknik STIA LAN Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30741/adv.v6i2.938

Keywords:

Service Quality, Higher Educational Institution, Confirmatory Factor Analysis

Abstract

The purpose of this study, which is to reveal a comprehensive picture of the quality of these services in the data obtained from the evaluation of service quality from the perspective of its main users, namely students. This study was conducted using a quantitative method with a confirmatory factor analysis approach with a cross-sectional design. The proposed model is based on a current conceptualization of service quality, which suggests that service quality is a multidimensional and hierarchical construct. The validity value of the factor model shows good results so that the quality of higher education services can be reflected in nine aspects, namely (1) educational facilities, (2) reliability, (3) responsiveness, (4) empathy, (5) academic services information systems, ( 6) general facilities & infrastructure, (7) students' interests and activities, (8) library services, and (9) financial services. The results of the study reveal that responsiveness is the factor that best reflects service quality in higher education. While the score for general facilities and infrastructure is the aspect that is rated the lowest, especially on the factor regarding cleanliness in toilets and public facilities. The paper has value for the higher educational institute (HEI) seeking to improve the quality of services they provide.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agustina, I., Pradesa, H. A., & Putranto, R. A. (2021). Peran Dimensi Motivasi Pelayanan Publik Dalam Meningkatkan Komitmen Afektif Pegawai. JEMAP: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, Akuntansi, Dan Perpajakan, 4(2), 218–235. https://doi.org/10.24167/jemap.v4i2.3237

Akareem, H. S., & Hossain, S. S. (2016). Determinants of education quality : what makes students ’ perception different ? Open Review of Educational Research, 3(1), 52–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/23265507.2016.1155167

Along, A., Sanggau, K., & Barat, K. (2020). Kualitas Layanan Administrasi Akademik di Politeknik Negeri Pontianak. Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik ( JIAP ), 6(1), 94–99.

Audina, S., & Jariah, A. (2017). Kepuasan Mahasiswa Sebagai Intervening Antara Kualitas Layanan Dan Citra Institusi Dengan Retensi. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Advantage, 1(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.30741/adv.v1i1.7

Bahri, M. S. (2020). The Effect of Competence, Price and Quality Of Service to The Satisfaction of Students. Wiga : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Ekonomi, 10(1), 60–65. https://doi.org/10.30741/wiga.v10i1.514

Epriliyana, N. N., Hapsari, Y. T., & Susanto, A. M. (2021). Student Loyalty in Perspective of Education Service Quality, Creative Promotion and Student Satisfaction. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Advantage, 5(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.30741/adv.v5i1.672

Haryanto, N. D., Zulvia, P., & Setiawan, B. (2021). Analisis Kualitas Pelayanan Dengan Kuadran Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) dan Indeks Potential Gain Customer Value (PGCV) Pada Kantor Pos Purworejo 54100. Progress Conference, 4(1), 413–423.

Jain, R., Sinha, G., & Sahney, S. (2011). Conceptualizing service quality in higher education. Asian Journal on Quality, 12(3), 296–314. https://doi.org/10.1108/15982681111187128

Novira, A., Priatna, R., & Pradesa, H. A. (2020). Pengaruh Dimensi Kualitas Layanan terhadap Kepuasan Pengguna Layanan Kesehatan Puskesmas di Kabupaten Sumedang Tahun 2019. JEMAP: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, Akuntansi, Dan Perpajakan, 3(2), 288–302.

Nuraieni, F. A., Ravenska, N., & Pradesa, H. A. (2021). Applying Importance Performance Analyzing Level of Service Quality Analysis ( IPA ) Method in. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Advantage, 5(2), 85–93.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.

Pradesa, H. A., Agustina, I., & Zulvia, P. (2022). Mengurai Faktor Terpenting Pada Kualitas Pelayanan Pembiayaan Murabahah Pada Bank Perkreditan Rakyat Syariah. Ekonomi, Keuangan, Investasi Dan Syariah (EKUITAS), 4(2), 725–734. https://doi.org/10.47065/ekuitas.v4i2.2419

Pramuditha, R. (2021). Aspek Terpenting Kualitas Layanan Dalam Meningkatkan Kepuasan Pelanggan : Sebuah Studi Empiris Pada Layanan E-KTP Kecamatan Bogor Barat. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Profesional, 2(1), 83–102.

Pramuditha, R., & Agustina, I. (2022). Persepsi Masyarakat Pengguna Atas Kualitas Pelayanan E-KTP Pada Kecamatan Bogor Barat. Jurnal Ilmiah MEA (Manajemen, Ekonomi, Dan Akuntansi), 6(1), 884–901.

Quinn, A., Lemay, G., Larsen, P., & Johnson, D. M. (2009). Service quality in higher education. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 20(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783360802622805

Sharabi, M. (2013). Managing and improving service quality in higher education. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 5(3), 309–320. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-03-2013-0016

Silva, D. S., Moraes, G. H. S. M. de, Makiya, I. K., & Cesar, F. I. G. (2017). Measurement of perceived service quality in higher education institutions: a review of HEdPERF scale use. Quality Assurance in Education, 25(4), 415–439.

Sulistyan, R. B., Pradesa, H. A., & Kasim, K. T. (2017). Peran Mediasi Kepuasan Dalam Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Dan Citra Institusi Terhadap Retensi Mahasiswa. Wiga : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Ekonomi, 7(2), 77–78. https://doi.org/10.30741/wiga.v7i2.337

Sultan, P., & Wong, H. Y. (2010). Service quality in higher education – a review and research agenda. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 2(2), 259–272. https://doi.org/10.1108/17566691011057393

Sultan, P., & Wong, H. Y. (2019). How service quality affects university brand performance, university brand image and behavioural intention: the mediating effects of satisfaction and trust and moderating roles of gender and study mode. Journal of Brand Management, 26(3), 332–347. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-018-0131-3

Teeroovengadum, V., Kamalanabhan, T. ., & Seebaluck, A. K. (2016). Measuring service quality in higher education: development of a hierarchical model (HESQUAL). Quality Assurance in Education, 24(2), 244–258.

Zulvia, P., & Haryanto, N. D. (2021). Increasing Customer Statisfaction Through Improving Service Quality At the Purworejo Post Office 54100. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu Dan Praktek Administrasi, 18(2), 195–211. https://doi.org/10.31113/jia.v18i2.796

Downloads

Published

2022-12-15

How to Cite

Zulvia, P., Gedeona, H. T. W., & Pradesa, H. A. (2022). Disentangling Important Factors in Service Quality: An Empirical Study in Vocational Higher Education at Bandung City. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Advantage, 6(2), 128–141. https://doi.org/10.30741/adv.v6i2.938