Triggering Turbulence: How Trump’s Tariff Talk Shook the Markets

Authors

  • Kenley Maccauley Riyono Universitas Ciputra
  • Nicklaus Stanley Universitas Ciputra
  • Rafael Savio Easter Universitas Ciputra
  • Vincent Adijaya Universitas Ciputra
  • Ruben Putranto Purnomo Universitas Ciputra
  • Luky Patricia Widianingsih Universitas Ciputra

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30741/wiga.v16i1.1658

Keywords:

Trump’s Reciprocal Tariff, Abnormal Return, Market Volatility

Abstract

On April 2, 2025, President Donald J. Trump imposed a 32% import tariff on Indonesia, triggering significant stock market volatility and global panic. This study aims to provide empirical evidence on whether there are significant differences in aggregate and cumulative abnormal returns before and after Trump’s reciprocal tariff policy announcement. The research adopts an event study approach, using a sample comprising all companies across 11 sectors listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The findings indicate that the Indonesian capital market responded negatively and significantly to Trump’s tariff announcement. This is reflected in a significant decline in the Aggregate Abnormal Return (AAR) on the first day following the announcement. The decline is also evident in the Cumulative Aggregate Abnormal Return (CAAR), which illustrates the aggregate market losses accumulated during the event window. However, the drop in AAR and CAAR lasted only for two days post-announcement, after which signs of recovery emerged from the third to the fifth day. Further analysis of sectoral Abnormal Returns (AR) shows that most sectors closely linked to international trade activities experienced a significantly negative decline in AR.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Dwiry, M., Al-Eitan, G. N., & Amira, W. (2022). FACTORS AFFECTING STOCK PRICE: EVIDENCE FROM COMMERCIAL BANKS IN THE DEVELOPING MARKET. Journal of Governance and Regulation, 11(4 Special Issue). https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv11i4siart14

Anolick, N., Batten, J. A., Kinateder, H., & Wagner, N. (2021). Time for gift giving: Abnormal share repurchase returns and uncertainty. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101787

Antoniuk, Y., & Leirvik, T. (2024). Climate change events and stock market returns. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1929804

Arenggaraya, K., & Djuwarsa, T. (2020). Pengaruh Faktor Internal dan Faktor Eksternal Terhadap Harga Saham Perusahaan Sektor Pertambangan di ISSI. Journal of Applied Islamic Economics and Finance, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.35313/jaief.v1i1.2405

Beckmann, J., & Czudaj, R. L. (2022). Exchange rate expectation, abnormal returns, and the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2022.02.002

Bouri, E., Naeem, M. A., Nor, S. M., Mbarki, I., & Saeed, T. (2022). Government responses to COVID-19 and industry stock returns. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja , 35(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2021.1929374

DEMİR, S. (2022). Comparison of Normality Tests in Terms of Sample Sizes under Different Skewness and Kurtosis Coefficients. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.1101295

Derrick, B., & White, P. (2016). Why Welch’s test is Type I error robust. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.12.1.p030

Dyckman, T., Philbrick, D., & Stephan, J. (1984). A Comparison of Event Study Methodologies Using Daily Stock Returns: A Simulation Approach. Journal of Accounting Research, 22. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490855

Ergin, M., & Koskan, Ö. (2023). Comparison of Student – t, Welch s t, and Mann – Whitney U Tests in Terms of Type I Error Rate and Test Power. Selcuk Journal of Agricultural and Food Sciences. https://doi.org/10.15316/sjafs.2023.022

Farooq, U., Nasir, A., Bilal, & Quddoos, M. U. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on abnormal returns of insurance firms: a cross-country evidence. Applied Economics, 53(31). https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2021.1884839

Frey, B. B. (2023). Paired-Samples t Test. In There’s a Stat for That!: What to Do & When to Do It. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071909775.n18

Gavalas, D., Syriopoulos, T., & Tsatsaronis, M. (2022). COVID–19 impact on the shipping industry: An event study approach. Transport Policy, 116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.11.016

Gjerstad, P., Meyn, P. F., Molnár, P., & Næss, T. D. (2021). Do President Trump’s tweets affect financial markets? Decision Support Systems, 147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2021.113577

Goldfeld, S. M., & Quandt, R. E. (1965). Some Tests for Homoscedasticity. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 60(310). https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1965.10480811

Hatem, G., Zeidan, J., Goossens, M., & Moreira, C. (2022). NORMALITY TESTING METHODS AND THE IMPORTANCE OF SKEWNESS AND KURTOSIS IN STATISTICAL ANALYSIS. BAU Journal - Science and Technology, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.54729/ktpe9512

Indonesia Stock Exchange. (2025). Indonesia Stock Exchange. Https://Www.Idx.Co.Id/Id.

Jiménez-Gamero, M., Valdora, M., & Rodríguez, D. (2025). Testing homoscedasticity of a large number of populations. Statistical Papers. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-024-01650-1

Katsileros, A., Antonetsis, N., Mouzaidis, P., Tani, E., Bebeli, P. J., & Karagrigoriou, A. (2024). A comparison of tests for homoscedasticity using simulation and empirical data. Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.29220/CSAM.2024.31.1.001

Khan, H., Rasheed, M. T., Zhang, S., Wang, X., & Liu, H. (2024). Empirical study of outlier impact in classification context. Expert Syst. Appl., 256, 124953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124953

Klomp, J. (2025). Trump tariffs and the U.S. defense industry. PLOS ONE, 20. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0313204

Kuramoto, Y., Khan, M., & Kadoya, Y. (2024). Behavioral Biases in Panic Selling: Exploring the Role of Framing during the COVID-19 Market Crisis. Risks. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks12100162

Liu, H., Manzoor, A., Wang, C., Zhang, L., & Manzoor, Z. (2020). The COVID-19 outbreak and affected countries stock markets response. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082800

Ortiz, D. P. (2023). Economic policy statements, social media, and stock market uncertainty: An analysis of Donald Trump’s tweets. Journal of Economics and Finance, 47(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-022-09608-5

Ota, A., & Takahashi, H. (2025). Impact of financing method on J-REIT unit price around seasoned equity offerings: Dilution and borrowing ratio effects on abnormal returns. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 91, 102712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2025.102712

Pandey, D. K., Kumar, R., & Kumari, V. (2024). Glasgow climate pact and the global clean energy index constituent stocks. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 19(10). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-05-2022-0815

Pandey, D. K., & Kumari, V. (2021). Event study on the reaction of the developed and emerging stock markets to the 2019-nCoV outbreak. International Review of Economics and Finance, 71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2020.09.014

Qin, Y., Yang, Z., & Bai, M. (2022). Heterogeneous firm-level responses to the US 2018 tariff announcement. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMF-08-2020-0437

Sayed, O. A., & Eledum, H. (2023). The short-run response of Saudi Arabia stock market to the outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic: An event-study methodology. International Journal of Finance and Economics, 28(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2539

Selmi, R., Errami, Y., & Wohar, M. E. (2020). What trump’s china tariffs have cost U.S. companies? Journal of Economic Integration, 35(2). https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2020.35.2.282

Shapiro, S. S., & Wilk, M. B. (1965). An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples). Biometrika, 52(3/4). https://doi.org/10.2307/2333709

Villena, M. J., & Araneda, A. A. (2024). On sectoral market efficiency. Finance Research Letters, 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104949

Wengerek, S. T. (2020). Share price reactions to tariff imposition announcements in the Trump era – An event study of the trade conflict. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3824616

Xu, M., Fralick, D., Zheng, J. Z., Wang, B., Tu, X. M., & Feng, C. (2017). The differences and similarities between two-sample t-test and paired t-test. Shanghai Archives of Psychiatry, 29(3). https://doi.org/10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.217070

Xu, Y. Y., Gu, S. M., & Min, F. (2022). Improving recommendation quality through outlier removal. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 13(7). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-021-01490-7

Yang, J., Rahardja, S., & Fränti, P. (2021). Mean-shift outlier detection and filtering. Pattern Recognition, 115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2021.107874

Ying, Q., Yousaf, T., Ain, Q. ul, Akhtar, Y., & Rasheed, M. S. (2019). Stock Investment and Excess Returns: A Critical Review in the Light of the Efficient Market Hypothesis. In Journal of Risk and Financial Management (Vol. 12, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm12020097

Yu, L., Liu, L., & Chen, D. (2018). A homoscedasticity test for the accelerated failure time model. Computational Statistics, 34, 433–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00180-018-0840-9

Zaremba, A., Aharon, D. Y., Demir, E., Kizys, R., & Zawadka, D. (2021). COVID-19, government policy responses, and stock market liquidity around the world: A note. Research in International Business and Finance, 56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101359

Zygmont, C. S. (2023). Managing the Assumption of Normality within the General Linear Model with Small Samples: Guidelines for Researchers Regarding If, When and How. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.19.4.p302

Downloads

Published

2026-03-13

How to Cite

Riyono, K. M., Stanley, N., Easter, R. S., Adijaya, V., Purnomo, R. P., & Widianingsih, L. P. (2026). Triggering Turbulence: How Trump’s Tariff Talk Shook the Markets. Wiga : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Ekonomi, 16(1), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.30741/wiga.v16i1.1658

Issue

Section

Articles